Centrists/fauxgressives be like: “We don’t wanna look like conspiracy theory whiney Bernie suporters like last time by using THAT word.” 1. That’s tone policing 2. That’s Gaslighting 3. It WAS rigged. Nothing’s changed. 4. More electeds should speak on it 5. Evidence abounds
-
-
Afficher cette discussionMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
I am uncomfortable with the word rigging and I support Sanders. What is that supposed to me? Hacking voting machines? Strongarming superdelegates? "Rigging" doesn't say much and I haven't seen credible proof of rigging that is actionable.
-
You can be uncomfortable with it based on what it makes people look like sure. But remaining uncomfortable perpetuates the narrative that there’s something wrong with saying the truth. Bc that’s what happened. There’s PLENTY of evidence of it in 2016 and plenty more coming now.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The question is, how do we overcome something that powerful
-
We actually speak up and demand justice using or voices, bodies, and numbers.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
You can’t have a revolution in a counterrevolutionary party
-
You can’t get counter revolutionaries in without people on the inside. You need both.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I love Sam Seder on the Majority Report, but they're very reluctant to use the word 'rigged', even when talking about 2016. I just don't know how you can see it any other way, then *and* now.
-
Hence why I don’t watch the majority of the indie pundits most progressives like

- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Glad they're financially struggling.
-
Yeah but that's what got them into the claws of Clinton.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.

