Well this explains his hating on Tulsi.
I don’t think TYT will be making an offer to @theconvocouch any time soon.
New: The Humanist Report joins TYT Network - TYT Networkhttps://legacy.tyt.com/2017/04/21/new-tyt-network-signs-the-humanist-report-to-channel-roster/ …
-
-
En réponse à @yopasta @theconvocouch
I don't really think this is very fair tbh. As a Bernie supporter who also likes Tulsi, I do think Mike does try to be fair & fair means sometimes also being critical. He's also praised her plenty, even as recently as a week or two ago in a video he made.
4 réponses 1 Retweet 27 j'aime -
You’re lacking in journalistic integrity when you’re claiming something is valid when 1) the campaign has repeatedly said it isn’t 2) you don’t have the receipts 3) you ignore all of that to jump on the popular bandwagon. Was I disturbed by her word choice? Absolutely. I get...
3 réponses 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
And I can’t wait til her plan comes out and everyone making assumptions & getting views off their hate has to take it back. Or if she proves them right, we will all call her out. Point is that has not happened yet.
1 réponse 1 Retweet 13 j'aime -
Her bill isn’t out, but we can’t judge her on her “word choice”? Everyone else yes, but not Tulsi. It’s hypocrisy.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 16 j'aime -
overtly defending her more than I am defending the truth but until we see a plan that’s difficult to say. 3.) Warren’s got a plan laid out specifically that’s NOT MEDICARE FOR ALL & has used “affordable & access”. I do pay attention to word choice as key but also the money.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @SavageJoyMarie1 et
Buttigieg & Biden have public options not private ones. Very different things. If we want to argue the specifics of insurance we are going to have to know exactly what we’re talking about. So Medicare for all can exist w private insurance. Which is what Gabbard *claims* to push.
2 réponses 1 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @SavageJoyMarie1 et
Difference & why I prefer Sanders is he is phasing our private insurance as per his plan to only have privacy companies deal w supplemental insurance. Gabbard’s model is more like Austrail’s or other countries in Europe who rely on private insurance for a small sector...
3 réponses 1 Retweet 5 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @SavageJoyMarie1 et
There isnt a reality for “
#M4A For All Who Want It”. b/c#M4A requires universality to work efficiently. Being offered in its place is a public option, which is equivalent of a govt. hmo. That doesn’t fix the broken system, nor get us closer to#M4A.https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/blog/public-option-aeu-doomed-start …1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @lesaAMOORE @SavageJoyMarie1 et
Again yes but we are conflating public option with private option. That exists in every major country which great single payer medical healthcare. What it covers depends. Bernie’s is best bc his reduces private insurance companies into little power so they soon become irrelevant.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Private options make sure everyone pays in regardless if they want to keep their plan or not. Meaning they would pay extra. Australia has an example of this. Public options are different bc not everyone pays into it. So with that it IS doomed bc you NEED everyone to pay into it.
-
-
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @lesaAMOORE et
Again dumb talking points, you don't get tired of breathlessly defending Tulsi because of your need to triangulate with other people from your network, it's alright people see through that. Australia does not have a great healthcare system either, they were designed way back
0 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.