.@HumanistReport succinctly explains why candidates claiming to support Medicare For All 'choice' that doesn't eliminate private insurance will actually give people less choice and create a two-tiered system that hurts the working class.https://youtu.be/7AhcAfQQqx4
-
-
En réponse à @AbbyMartin @HumanistReport
Tbh he’s telling half truths bc he hasn’t seen her plan. While as a Berner I disagree w using words that could signify away from
#MedicareForAll, I’m awaiting for details ínstead of making assumptions. Considering the bias of Mike against Gabbard I’d take his words lightly.7 réponses 4 Retweets 35 j'aime -
You can make a pretty good assumption based on the language used by a candidate. Tulsi clearly said she wants employees to have the option of keep their insurance gained from their workplace or choose the government insurance. What would you call that other than a public option?
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
If we are going to have a discussion we must know what we’re talking about. She claims everyone will pay into it REGARDLESS of whether they want to keep their plan or not, so that’s a PRIVATE OPTION. A public option would mean they do NOT pay into it. Not the same thing.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
A public option would be problematic bc people can choose not to pay into it so the system wouldn’t work bc we need everyone to pay into it. But again I’ll refrain from full assessment until she releases her plan. If it’s not single payer health I’ll go after it. But we’ll see.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.