I (respectfully) disagree, for a few reason: 1. The complainant had no direct knowledge, and was therefore NOT a "whistleblower." Interestingly, the "intelligence community" changed their rules about this, and their form, shortly before this came out:https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/27/intel-community-secretly-gutted-requirement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/ …
-
-
I've got no issue with boycotts etc. The problem I see is that BDS refuses to see the root problem with Zionism itself. Namely that Zionists chose the holy land to fulfill ancient biblical prophecy. Giving back some land doesn't solve why Palestinians are fixated with Jerusalem.
-
Sorry no. It was their land to begin with. Israel occupied their land. Literally. To say otherwise is a lie. The Jewish peopels never has a land bc they’re an ethnicity of people. And they didn’t only occupy, Israel used US aid to kill, displace and push Palestinians away.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
There's a fair bit of nuance there actually... Two things often ended up getting conflated by both sides: 1. The specific organization/movement known as "BDS." 2. The larger concept of ANY sort of boycott against products produced in either Israel and/or Occupied Territories.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.

shams!
However I think this could work in the long run if she plays her cards right .