What ppl don’t get about Tulsi: If she were a fraud she’d b pandering to us, copying bernie, saying what we wanted. She’s progressive bc her actions came when it was least popular & she had much to lose. I don’t have to agree w her. She’s honest, even @ the risk of losing support
-
-
If she were a fraud she would be doing what Warren does & pandering. But she’s taking independent stances that risk her career rather than secure it. The OPPOSITE of what Warren did. This means she genuinely believes in doing the right thing & not based on reactionary choice.
-
Integrity is not synonymous to honesty. Perhaps she does indeed remain true to her ethics, but that alone also doesn’t necessarily mean she is a progressive. A progressive works for the good of all, not just a select few. Thats what differentiates Bernie as a true progressive
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
I didn’t miss the point. Im simply saying that honesty alone does not suggest progressivism. That claim is inaccurate.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.