"Private option."
https://twitter.com/QueenInYeIIow/status/1160185705278169093 …
-
0:52Afficher cette discussion -
En réponse à @HumanistReport
“But I’m not against Tulsi” even though every other video is a subtle, very polite, gaslighting way of attempting to discredit her. I also say* read the damn bill. All of them. Voting Bernie here but this is not correct. Every. Single. Bill. Includes. Private. Insurance. Bud.
14 réponses 11 Retweets 78 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im
You’re wrong, but I hope if you truly believed that you’d fight to change the bills, otherwise you’re taking the more neoliberal position by defending for-profit vultures in our healthcare. I’m assuming you’ve changed your position to align with Tulsi though, right?
9 réponses 1 Retweet 37 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @Fiorella_im
Wrong! The objective is making sure every American is completely covered under a single payer universal insurance at no cost. Wether anyone wants to have a private form of insurance in addition or instead of that is their choice. This even guarantees Medicare for all gets passed
6 réponses 1 Retweet 17 j'aime -
En réponse à @BrowardOur @Fiorella_im
And I'd be okay with that—it's preferable than what we have now—however most countries that have single-payer or NHS have some private, for-profit component. The result? Constant threat of more privatization. If healthcare is the #1 goal, why keep that threat?
5 réponses 1 Retweet 39 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @BrowardOur
No one is arguing our preferences. I prefer socialized medicine entirely. But that’s irrelevant. People are arguing what’s actually in those bills. You can’t put your feelings in the bill. They’re irrelevant. They say what they say. Regardless of our preferences.
4 réponses 3 Retweets 34 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @BrowardOur
The Humanist Report 🌹 a retweeté The Humanist Report 🌹
Ironic that someone telling me not to put FeELiNgS OvEr FaCts refuses to listen to the author and architect of the bill (or read it). Why? Because you're stanning, hence why you claim I'm being emotional, because that's all you got: shit. You're a hack.https://twitter.com/HumanistReport/status/1160348537655197696 …
The Humanist Report 🌹 ajouté,
The Humanist Report 🌹 @HumanistReport"People are happy to get rid of private insurance; they just want to know they can keep their doctors and hospitals, even if they switch or lose their jobs. Medicare-for-all would let them do so." -@PramilaJayapal Precisely.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/08/01/its-time-democrats-get-their-facts-right-medicare-for-all/ …Afficher cette discussion6 réponses 3 Retweets 23 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @BrowardOur
You obviously didn’t read it &your reaction shows it. Also I don’t Stan for Tulsi. I’m simply saying the truth. I’m volunteering for Bernie. Which is more than you’re doing being on Twitter & lying. I BeLieve the man who wrote the damn bil by reading the bill. Which you should do
8 réponses 8 Retweets 51 j'aime -
But Tulsi Gabbard is changing the language.
4 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime
Point is EVERYONE IS COVERED period no questions asked. That’s the pt of M4ALL. As long as we have that we can work then to get the hell rid of insurance companies. But we don’t even have that bc progs spend too much time listening to egos who don’t know legislation rant online
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.