This video describes my concerns as well. Would @TulsiGabbard please provide a clarification on exactly where she means when she says people should have a choice of private insurance or #MedicareForAll? @TerrenceMcNulty @nikoCSFB @Fiorella_imhttps://twitter.com/HumanistReport/status/1159857088287236096 …
-
-
This is not correct. It removes duplicative care. That includes all private insurance as it exists today. There are currently no private insurance plans that cover the things Med4all will not cover. That is because neither exists yet.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
#BernieSanders'#MedicareForAll plan doesn't **explicitly** eliminate for-profit health insurance companies, but it **effectively** eliminates them since they can't cover anything#M4A covers. If enacted as is, they would go out of business, and#goodriddance to them.Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
duplicative.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Well...technically Jayapal’s plan is the most thought out and quickest way but yeah lol
-
Bernie just said on JRE that it will take 4 years to lower the medicare age to 0. Which means everyone under those age restrictions during the transition period will have... wait for it...PRIVATE INSURANCE. Once that 4 yr period is over. What role will private Ins play? TBD.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The point is this: Tulsi’s explanation here is shitty and is honestly on par with Warren’s wishy washyness on M4A. I won’t stan for that, like you both are. However, I will say that Bernie’s plan does allow for private health insurance to cover things as long as they aren’t
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.