There's more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbcu2gzI-ic …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmAKt7-Bmt8 …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0se1Xcw8Ks …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7dAKag4yqE …
But according to you, I'm "smearing" her by criticizing her on a limited number of issues. 
-
-
Just because u said something positive, which I never said u didn’t, doesn’t mean u didn’t engage in the smears. Not to mention all the piling on u attempted to do on twitter during the Ana debacle - once again under the guise of objectivity. But I’ll let u call it
9 réponses 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
Criticizing a candidate is not a "smear." In my first critique video I debunked smears and went out of my way to be fair. I also criticized Bernie on reparations, Venezuela, and Assange. I'm just doing my best to be fair and objective, but you can be offended all you want.
8 réponses 4 Retweets 199 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @nikoCSFB et
I really hate to take sides here......cuz I like all of you. But Mike hasn't done anything wrong. Niko and Fio are seeming to come after Mike for almost no reason other than to continue to stan for Tulsi. Niko's video the other day defending Tulsi's vote was absolutely cringe.
12 réponses 7 Retweets 217 j'aime -
En réponse à @WinkleAbides @HumanistReport et
Really? So him talking shit isn’t doing anything wrong? Gtfoh with that Wink. U know me better than that. He tried to make a backhanded comment and thought no one would call him out on it. Period.
12 réponses 1 Retweet 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @nikoCSFB @HumanistReport et
Be that as it may, its hard for me not to see your guys bias anymore. Fio came into this thread with her own passive aggressive comments at Mike to stan for Tulsi against a perceived bias that I honestly do not see out of Mike. Again, I like you guys, this is all very toxic
8 réponses 1 Retweet 116 j'aime -
En réponse à @WinkleAbides @nikoCSFB et
And you’re dismissing what he said. And he literally said that and it’s not okay. But please y’all can believe the white guy and not defend the two POC that’s kinda how it happens in general anyway when we are gaslighted.pic.twitter.com/iNutjB0obL
19 réponses 0 Retweet 8 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @nikoCSFB et
Her vote against the BDS movement is asinine. Mike is right. You are allowed to give her credit when credits due but in this case, tulsi is in the wrong, and you guys defending her no matter what also proves mikes point
1 réponse 2 Retweets 65 j'aime -
En réponse à @itsconorbitch @nikoCSFB et
The point made is that they’re all bad on BDS. Including Bernie. Given the vote he would have voted just the same. But they’re highlighting only Gabbard. It’s everyone that’s wrong. Period.pic.twitter.com/nFOmWPzg8Y
8 réponses 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @nikoCSFB et
And also Bernie didn’t vote on it. So why criticize him? Hypotheticals don’t work
2 réponses 0 Retweet 8 j'aime
You’re still going on? I know Bernie’s record. I bring it up bc my issue isn’t defending Gabbard. It’s defending the obvious bias against her. As a Bernie supporter I think it’s unfair. I mention him bc he would’ve voted the same based on his stance. We’ll see soon.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.