Also, you can call my good faith criticism a "smear" if that makes you feel better, but here's all the times I praised/defended her AFTER she announced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QOPBUpLjqA … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qADERH_0wdU … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oREsrC4IzEc … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfFBEx9gIJw …https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM8j1jvF8FY …
-
-
En réponse à @HumanistReport @nikoCSFB et
There's more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbcu2gzI-ic … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmAKt7-Bmt8 … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0se1Xcw8Ks … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7dAKag4yqE … But according to you, I'm "smearing" her by criticizing her on a limited number of issues.
4 réponses 3 Retweets 127 j'aime -
Just because u said something positive, which I never said u didn’t, doesn’t mean u didn’t engage in the smears. Not to mention all the piling on u attempted to do on twitter during the Ana debacle - once again under the guise of objectivity. But I’ll let u call it
9 réponses 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
Criticizing a candidate is not a "smear." In my first critique video I debunked smears and went out of my way to be fair. I also criticized Bernie on reparations, Venezuela, and Assange. I'm just doing my best to be fair and objective, but you can be offended all you want.
8 réponses 4 Retweets 199 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @nikoCSFB et
I really hate to take sides here......cuz I like all of you. But Mike hasn't done anything wrong. Niko and Fio are seeming to come after Mike for almost no reason other than to continue to stan for Tulsi. Niko's video the other day defending Tulsi's vote was absolutely cringe.
12 réponses 7 Retweets 217 j'aime -
En réponse à @WinkleAbides @HumanistReport et
Really? So him talking shit isn’t doing anything wrong? Gtfoh with that Wink. U know me better than that. He tried to make a backhanded comment and thought no one would call him out on it. Period.
12 réponses 1 Retweet 14 j'aime -
En réponse à @nikoCSFB @HumanistReport et
Be that as it may, its hard for me not to see your guys bias anymore. Fio came into this thread with her own passive aggressive comments at Mike to stan for Tulsi against a perceived bias that I honestly do not see out of Mike. Again, I like you guys, this is all very toxic
8 réponses 1 Retweet 116 j'aime -
En réponse à @WinkleAbides @HumanistReport et
First of all, your bias is clearly showing because Fiorella has openly endorsed Bernie and if she “Stans” for anyone it’s him. But she doesn’t settle for hypocrisy coming out of so called progressives who claim to be objective because there has clearly been a double standard set
2 réponses 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @nikoCSFB @HumanistReport et
But if you think Mike hasn’t shown his clear bias in the past before he EVENTUALLY evolved, then there’s nothing left to discuss. That’s simply selective ignorance.
14 réponses 1 Retweet 7 j'aime -
En réponse à @nikoCSFB @HumanistReport et
I feel like this child between my two favorite queers
This gay
is sad

pic.twitter.com/kgShmiibLm1 réponse 2 Retweets 4 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.
