“I know she has a 100% voting record on LGBTQ issues. But I’m still skeptical.” That’s just one example. I get it. U got a job to do. But just because someone gets access u don’t doesn’t mean they kissed ass. Just means we know what we’re doing 
-
-
Is that a direct quote from me? How does that constitute a “hissy fit”? You’re not making sense. Also what’s my “job” that makes me so “biased”? Explain that. Didn’t you literally say Tulsi was your personal friend? Maybe you’re not the best to assess people’s bias.
3 réponses 5 Retweets 173 j'aime -
Mike, let’s not play stupid. You know how you acted when Tutsi first announced and u started doubling down on the nonsense the moment u saw others get an interview and u didn’t get one. Repeating those nonsensical smears under the guise of “objectivity”.
10 réponses 1 Retweet 16 j'aime -
I didn't reach her to her team, they reached out to me, but realized I wasn't going to give her a softball interview, so they backed off. I like Tulsi, but I'm not friends with her or any candidate like you are, so it's easier for me to be objective and critique her.
4 réponses 4 Retweets 149 j'aime -
Lmao no. I do remember u reached to her team. And then u started doubling down. U think they expect a softball interview from anyone? Especially at a time where 95% of y’all were smearing her when y’all didn’t have shit but positive things to say before she announced?
11 réponses 2 Retweets 18 j'aime -
Also, you can call my good faith criticism a "smear" if that makes you feel better, but here's all the times I praised/defended her AFTER she announced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QOPBUpLjqA … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qADERH_0wdU … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oREsrC4IzEc … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfFBEx9gIJw …https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM8j1jvF8FY …
5 réponses 2 Retweets 117 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @nikoCSFB et
There's more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbcu2gzI-ic … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmAKt7-Bmt8 … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0se1Xcw8Ks … https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7dAKag4yqE … But according to you, I'm "smearing" her by criticizing her on a limited number of issues.
4 réponses 3 Retweets 127 j'aime -
Just because u said something positive, which I never said u didn’t, doesn’t mean u didn’t engage in the smears. Not to mention all the piling on u attempted to do on twitter during the Ana debacle - once again under the guise of objectivity. But I’ll let u call it
9 réponses 1 Retweet 12 j'aime -
Criticizing a candidate is not a "smear." In my first critique video I debunked smears and went out of my way to be fair. I also criticized Bernie on reparations, Venezuela, and Assange. I'm just doing my best to be fair and objective, but you can be offended all you want.
8 réponses 4 Retweets 199 j'aime -
En réponse à @HumanistReport @nikoCSFB et
I really hate to take sides here......cuz I like all of you. But Mike hasn't done anything wrong. Niko and Fio are seeming to come after Mike for almost no reason other than to continue to stan for Tulsi. Niko's video the other day defending Tulsi's vote was absolutely cringe.
12 réponses 7 Retweets 217 j'aime
Uh I mentioned his tweets were an issue. Then he literally insinuated “we kiss ass” so Niko said something. That’s hardly “not doing anything wrong” or us coming after him. So sorry but not accurate.
-
-
En réponse à @Fiorella_im @HumanistReport et
You’ve been on a tear all day playing what-about- ism with Tulsi’s votes. We aren’t defending Ro, or Talib, or AOC we’re criticizing them all but you guys keep getting triggered when we circle over to Tulsi. Keep in mind Tulsi is running for president so she gets more attention.
0 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aimeMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.