So our President should be getting us into another war that will cost Americans trillions of dollars & hurt thousands of people, instead of trying to avoid it? Rich coming from the woman who voted to raise Trump’s military budget every time.https://twitter.com/ewarren/status/1145338268197838848 …
-
-
En réponse à @Fiorella_im
I see no hawkishness in this tweet, and she hasn't voted for every Trump military budget. Trump legitimized NK and got nothing in return. He said he had a sweet deal but had nothing. No end to nukes. No end to the war. Nothing. It's a huge embarrassment.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @gwiech
It’s political military talk for war. We are not at war w/ N. Korea. We’ve done so much to them. Talking to people is diplomacy. Being belligerent and threatening them is what Liz means by “diplomacy,” it’s lingo. Like “accesses to affordable healthcare” there are key words.
3 réponses 0 Retweet 2 j'aime -
En réponse à @Fiorella_im
Not really. Trump has bent over backwards for Kim. What have we gotten? Literally nothing, and we've shown up our actual allies in South Korea. Trump has learned what many others knew before, that Kim isn't interested in any deal. Kim wanted to be seen as an equal. Now he is.
2 réponses 0 Retweet 1 j'aime
Do you have actual proof that Trump has bent over backwards for Kim? I just hear this on msm and have never seen evidence. But people love repeating it. It’s not about Trump. He’s surrounded by war hawks. Any attempt to secure peace is the progressive objective.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.