There is nothing about this tweet which is correct.
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
En réponse à @blanarphd @opendna et
Because they're like trump supporters. They think that if people don't agree with them, it must be a conspiracy by Neoliberal Democratic Establishment Illuminati. It's kind of sad.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 13 j'aime -
Actually she's 100% correct that NPP's were issued in the to new registrants, that they were deliberately not counted, and that a bejeezus of ballots weren't counted after the AP called the state before the Primary even *started. But hey totally normal:https://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/06/10/after-frustrating-primary-millions-ballots-california-remain-uncounted …
3 réponses 1 Retweet 3 j'aime -
Actually, she's not correct: cross-party ballots were not provisional ballots, and provisional ballots were counted. It just took more than three days because LA is more populous than most STATES. And the Jungle Primary came in 2018.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 7 j'aime -
Provisional ballots don't usually get counted unless the margin is slim enough to demand they do
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
Sigh. from your own source. Also, this is the uninformed bullshit that Berners thrive on. The votes were counted. She won. Easily. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/07/one-month-later-california-finishes-its-vote-count-and-clinton-wins/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e6975893649b …pic.twitter.com/JwayKGLt44
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime -
En réponse à @whinemomOK @opendna et
Lol I'm just gonna say it one more time and highlighting random sentences that just make claims won't make it any different: provisional ballots don't get counted unless it's a small margin. Ergo if late registrants are forced to vote w provisional, final total is inaccurate.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
En réponse à @donaltc @whinemomOK et
Now it's very possible all provisionals *were counted. But I've never seen any total that makes a point to note they were. It would be more in line w traditional elections that they weren't .
3 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @donaltc @whinemomOK et
There’s lots of detail on the CA SOS website. The ballots were counted. https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov//sov/2016-primary/04-no-party-pref-ballot-requests.pdf …
1 réponse 0 Retweet 3 j'aime
Lol that’s the ones that were. Hundreds of thousands were not.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.