i just read this as "i haven't read a book" and was gonna rib you
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My understanding was that the film was written mainly to recreate the creepy feeling the book gave the screenwriter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He even barrows scenes stuff out of the movie for Roadside Picnic. It just seems weird to make a Solaris/Stalker remake by buying the rights to an unrelated book in order to do it.
-
It's not weird. It's (apparently) not that different. He told the story. The book still exists. Im really not sure what you're looking for here but it seems... strict.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
As someone who HAS read the book, I was super glad Garland took the liberties he did. A lot of the book wouldn’t translate well to screen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My GF read the whole trilogy, and I was getting ready to start it, but she asked me to wait and watch the movie first so we could have different perspectives. We both *loved* the movie.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's actually pretty good if you go in knowing that. However, if you've read all three and didn't expect the Solaris/stalker stuff, it mostly feels like someone read the wrong book.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Play nice!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's interesting that the guy mentioned Roadside Picnic, since Tarkovsky pretty much did wit that book what Garland did to Annihilation: they both adapted the surreality they read and morphed a premise into something new and different and beautiful
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.