correct?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It suggests she only knew of a plan for "a threatening letter"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It kinda embraces the idea that there are different stories about how it all went down and the public will probably never know the Truth, so while the movie kinda takes her side, it does acknowledge that she might have helped
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since the movie starts with "most of this is based on testimony from known liars" it's hard to tell what the movie 'posits'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Leaves it ambiguous, by virtue of it being mostly from her POV. They don't leave out the practice schedule on a napkin, in her handwriting. They also don't explain it at all. But even Jeff's dialogue in the story plainly states she had no hand, though again, unreliable narrator.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fat guy is the villain. But it’s also evoking Rashomon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It plays coy but seems to take the stance that she was cool with intimidation but didn’t know about the physical attack and wasn’t happy about it when she found out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’d say that’s an awfully simplistic reading of the narrative. *Tonya* posits that she didn’t help plan the attack, but the movie gives you ample cause to doubt her sincerity.
-
That’s true, but the movie is still more credulous than the facts seem to warrant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tonya, in I, TONYA, posits that she didn't help.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.