I am so sick and tired of this false approximation from reputable sites that literally have no idea about people's pasts and the shit they hath wrought. He was a monster with only monstrous goals. End of story. Your attempt at nuance is a disgusting sheen on horror.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I can't get over this. It is this insane preoccupation with "intelligence" and seeing the possible upside in monsters that makes these colossal idiots surprised when monsters go monster. He built a system of harassment. Again. End of story.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The economist is bad and has been for a while. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/05/how-the-economist-thinks …
-
But there's not a lot else to read to stop myself getting bored on long train journeys when I have forgotten a book (once I have read New Scientist).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Pretending to be the "sensible middle ground", Very Serious publications like The Economist are instead blown hither and thither by wherever the Overton Window shifts. What politics is more "normal" and "sensible" than the one at the centre of hegemonic power?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What did you expect from them? This is the same UK Magazine that constantly calls Jeremy Corbyn a communist to help prop up the Conservative party, Of course they desperately want to view the republicans as the good guys.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His stated goal was literally to destroy the government. He said this to a reporter on the record. This is what drove him, not any desire to better represent the people. What a ridiculous revisionist article.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.