Because the simple truth is that ugly, disgusting thoughts demand to be treated with civil respect as a method of validation. And I'm not going to give them that.
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @David_Nataf
I've spent the last year having literal nazis come up to be like "talk to me! validate me as your equal!, won't do it eh? well i guess we know who the REAL asshole is." which is just weaponized civility.
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @David_Nataf
You can't have a civil discussion about inherently uncivil ideas.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
There were indeed tons of inane arguments against Episode 8, but that doesn't negate that plenty of good people (far-left people in this context) had fair reasons to not love or even dislike the movie.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @David_Nataf
What is your point with what the hell i said then. Or is it just the ridiculous fear you are getting lumped in with awful people?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
A bit of part B, also the fact it's unfortunate that the conversation on SW8 has been ruined by extremes and reactions thereof. That's also true of some other recent blockbusters and so many of us may just check out of fandom.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @David_Nataf @FilmCritHULK
I saw plenty of normal, sane people love, be lukewarm to, or despise SW8. I think that's interesting but two weeks later we're largely reacting to the 47-minute fan edit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @David_Nataf
I literally haven't seen a single reasonable damn argument.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
I can see why you'd be more worried about that given your success, which has the side effect of making you a troll magnet. But I know some of these people well, many of whom don't participate online fandom, I'm confident that they're not recycling toxic shit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @David_Nataf @FilmCritHULK
I liked (did not love) the movie, anyway here are some critiques I found reasonable. 1) Prank calling the first order shouldn't work as an attack strategy. Aren't these fights meant to be metaphors of WWII naval battles? 2) No explanation for Snoke. We'll have to read the books.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
how in gods name are either of those valid story criticisms and not 1) im arguing about nonsense logic over joking tone and 2) i wanted more nonsense backstory to this character that doesn't need it
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
The first one was distraction and pulled me and others out of the film, as it was very unnatural. As for #2, I think Snoke warranted an explanation, he restored the empire, he's apparently a much stronger force user than everybody else, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @David_Nataf
Seriously dude. Both of those things are inane and have literally nothing to do with compelling storytelling. Just post-script logic.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.