I feel it was earlier. It was "product", for hair.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(This has always been the case)
-
Mm. Seems difficult to prove and depends heavily on what definition of “consume” you’re using. Interesting to carry out logical conclusions, though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Whats worse for me is "consumption". Like the first time I saw a normal person say "content consumption" I threw up in my mouth a bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What war?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyone who is in the business of ‘content creation’ is a flaming moron IMHO. No self respecting artist thinks of what they’re toiling over in those terms. But, hey, I’m happy to take money off people who clamour for ‘content’, as long as it gets spent on art.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Heads up
@mikerugnettaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder what the Italian for ‘content’ is? I bet there were wealthy merchants shelling out for it during the Renaissance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
None of that was mentioned in the context of his tweet. I’m not a moron so I’m aware the Internet didn’t exist in the far past.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is more interesting, but I still don’t think it’s all that different from the past.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.