AND SO IT ALWAYS FEELS WEIRD TO CALL A DIRECTOR THAT, ESPECIALLY IF THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY WRITE THE FUCKER. BUT YA KNOW. PERSONAL OPINION.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
Stanley Kubrick didn't write most of his movies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @spaghetti
PLEASE LOOK UP LITERALLY FOUR INCHES TO THE PART WHERE HULK SAYS WHY HULK DOESN'T LIKE THAT WORD.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @spaghetti
YEAH I DID, HULK. THIS IS ME DIFFERING IN OPINION
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MPen_2501 @spaghetti
BUT YOU'RE NOT MAKING A COUNTER-POINT. YOU'RE JUST SAYING AN AMAZING DIRECTOR DIDN'T WRITE FILMS. WHICH WE KNOW.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @spaghetti
Okay. Personally, I don't think directors have to have written their films to be considered auteurs, IE: Kubrick.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I understand film is a massive collaborative process. However, the director is the one that runs the show. They're the director.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MPen_2501 @spaghetti
INDEED. WHICH IS WHY HULK JUST CALLS THEM DIRECTORS.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
REALIZE WE ARE JUST ARGUING SEMANTICS HERE. BUT IT GETS AT A DEEP POINT ABOUT AUTHORSHIP FOR HULK.
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @spaghetti
Understandable. It actually does bug me that writers don't get more credit. Same for cinematographers, with exceptions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Roger Deakins is just as important to Villeneuve's projects as Villeneuve is.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.