FOLKS FOLKS FOLKS. PEOPLE CAN BE REALLY GREAT DIRECTORS WITHOUT BEING CLASSIC "AUTEURS." THE POINT STILL STANDS.
-
-
Show this thread
-
OHHHHHKAY. TO CLARITY YET AGAIN. AND YES, THIS IS JUST SEMANTICS. BUT HULK FEELS REALLY WEIRD CALLING SOMEONE AN AUTEUR. ALWAYS HAVE.
Show this thread -
THE ONLY TIME IT EVER MAKES EVEN SOME SMALL KIND OF SENSE IS WITH WRITER / DIRECTORS AND THAT'S PROBABLY THE ONLY TIME.
Show this thread -
AND THIS ISN'T TO SAY DIRECTORS CAN'T HAVE A VOICE, OR STORY SENSE, OR ANY OF THAT CRITICAL STUFF.
Show this thread -
IT'S JUST THAT FILMMAKING IS A COLLECTIVE AUTHORSHIP. A COLLABORATIVE ART AT THE FULLEST.
Show this thread -
AND SO IT ALWAYS FEELS WEIRD TO CALL A DIRECTOR THAT, ESPECIALLY IF THEY DIDN'T ACTUALLY WRITE THE FUCKER. BUT YA KNOW. PERSONAL OPINION.
Show this thread -
THIS THREAD HAS LITERALLY DEVOLVED INTO PEOPLE JUST SAYING "BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS GOOD DIRECTOR!"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I legit thought that was an
@filmtwiter tweet when I first saw it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do auteurs necedsarily have to write their own movies to be considered auteurs though?
-
*necessarily
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.