WHAT DOES.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ForgetAmnesia @FilmCritHULK
DUDE, YES!! Kubrick was a technical master but his films are too often emotionally distant or non-existent. This is a problem Nolan has too.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Michael_Flinn @ForgetAmnesia
NEVER MISTAKE DISTANT FOR UNEMOTIONAL. WROTE ABOUT THAT MISTAKE W/ NOLAN RECENTLY.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @ForgetAmnesia
True. I still feel for Nolan's characters so he's not as bad about it as Kubrick tended to be.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Michael_Flinn @ForgetAmnesia
GUYS. PUTTING YOU AT A DISTANCE WAS THE ENTIRE POINT OF HIS APPROACH.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @ForgetAmnesia
And while distance doesn't equal unemotional, it makes it harder to connect with the characters we are supposed to care about.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Michael_Flinn @ForgetAmnesia
GUYS. YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO CARE ABOUT THEM. KUBRICK'S MOVIES ARE ABOUT HOW YOU CAN SEE HUMANITY FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES BEYOND THAT.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @ForgetAmnesia
If I'm not meant to care, what's the bloody point? What's the audience anchor to keep them invested if not the characters?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
KUBRICK'S GENIUS WAS DOING THIS, WHILE ALSO MAKING DEEPLY UNNERVING, VISCERAL ART AROUND IT.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.