THE INTENT OF THESE ARGUMENTS IS (SUPPOSEDLY) TO LOOK AT THE SPECIFICITY OF LANGUAGE AND FOOD DEFINITIONS.
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
THE ACTUAL POINT OF FOOD DEFINITIONS IS TO, YOU KNOW, COMMUNICATE WHAT THINGS ARE.
2 replies 4 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
IF YOU SAID YOU'D BRING HULK A SANDWICH AND YOU BROUGHT PIZZA HULK WOULD LOOK AT YOU WERE LIKE A CRAZY PERSON.
5 replies 3 retweets 45 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
What if I brought a Gyro? Because they call them a gyro sandwich but it doesn't look like a traditional sandwich.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickBurnside
THAT'S WHY THE TERM "GYRO" IS SO IMPORTANT TO THE SECOND PART. IT TELLS YOU WHAT IT IS.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
So then isnt it never enough to just say sandwich? Shouldnt we always specify "Turkey Sandwich" or "Veggie Sandwich"?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickBurnside
ONE IT, WOULDN'T HURT. TWO, THE OTHER DESIGNATION BECOMES MORE IMPORTANT THE MORE "NON-TRADITIONAL" THE SANDWICH BECOMES. LIKE GYRO.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
So what would you say is the exact line? Whats the least a sandwich can be and still only be called a sandwich?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
Im just saying there's always a line and unless we draw it there's gonna be chaos in the blurry middle
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
THAT'S LITERALLY NOT TRUE. AND A MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE POINT OF LANGUAGE.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.