OK THAT'S IT. ALL THESE "_____ ARE TECHNICALLY A SANDWICH!" ARGUMENTS ARE ASININE TO THE POINT OF ABSURDITY.
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
THE INTENT OF THESE ARGUMENTS IS (SUPPOSEDLY) TO LOOK AT THE SPECIFICITY OF LANGUAGE AND FOOD DEFINITIONS.
1 reply 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
THE ACTUAL POINT OF FOOD DEFINITIONS IS TO, YOU KNOW, COMMUNICATE WHAT THINGS ARE.
2 replies 4 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
Sure, but that's not really fair. Like any taxonomy, there's friction between utility (read: ease of communication) and exactness.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HickNurwitz @FilmCritHULK
Like, if I said, "Do you want to watch a movie?" and then showed you 18 minutes of popcorn popping, you'd be pretty confused.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @HickNurwitz
THAT'S THE WHOLE THING. THE USE OF RIGID TECHNICAL TERMS NEED TO HELP, NOT MAKE MORE VAGUE.
7:50 PM - 5 May 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.