Here's my question... why? What possible reason could there be to get rid of pre-existing condition law? It costs the taxpayer nothing.
-
-
*Bernie voice whispering in the wind* sing-le pay-er...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
U mean health insurance? Afaik Universal health coverage isn't profitable anywhere. On the opposite.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
| Insurance is a very sensible racket. Simple numbers game. It just gets iffy when the insured goods are human lives.
-
| Mandatory participation is required for preexisting conditions to be covered. In the end only single-payer makes sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.