and just logistics: how going back meant driving directly through the people they spent the whole movie running from? /3
-
-
Replying to @iamwhoisme @houx
*SQUINTS* UH, THERE ARE VERY OBVIOUS ANSWERS TO EACH OF THOSE POINTS...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @houx
Please... I always found the premise of the movie rendered its ending fruitless.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I meant please tell me what they are. Since the movie is like a more extreme version of appointing an outspoken 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
feminist the leader of Saudi Arabia /2
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And i guess I don't get to hear the 'obvious' explanation how a society violent, and misogynistic to satisfy the 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
movie's moral and wild enough to be wedged into the Mad Max franchise suddenly accepts a queen. 2/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's OK to like the message of a movie, but if that's a consideration of quality you're supporting propaganda not art /3
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iamwhoisme
SUDDENLY ACCEPTS A QUEEN? PROPAGANDA? WHAT IN THE SAM FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
Fine, not a queen, a tribal ruler with many of the same powers as a queen. Yeesh
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
AND JUSTIFYING THAT BY SAYING THE SOCIETY INSIDE THE MOVIE WOULD NOT ACCEPT. IT'S BACKWARDS LOGIC. AND WRONG.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.