LATE ON THIS FRIDAY NIGHT, ANYONE WANT TO DO JUST A LITTLE 3 QUESTION Q+A?
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
would mind control that only sways people as frequently and as severely as being attractive be unethical
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cybren
BEYOND SEVERELY. YOU ARE LITERALLY TALKING ABOUT TAKING CHOICE AWAY. ATTRACTION ISN'T "CONTROL."
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
so if the effective result both in frequency and magnitude is the same what makes it different?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Cybren
WE'VE TALKED BEFORE, SO HULK WANTS TO GIVE BENEFIT OF DOUBT, BUT IS WHAT YOU'RE ASKING REALLY NOT SINKING IN?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
it's just a thought experiment I've considered before: a professor x that can't control his power but is really weak
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
THE TWO AREN'T COMPARABLE. THAT'S THE PROBLEM. BEING ATTRACTED TO SOMEONE IS POSITIVE TRAIT AMONG POTENTIALLY CONSENTING ADULTS.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.