@FilmCritHULK Probably reflects both of their thoughts about the movie. Maybe unconsciously. I'm probably 100% wrong though.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK It kind of shows both ends of the Farrellys' movies arc. They've been steading moving in this direction for a while.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK Are we talking here about the difference between a charming comedy for the first, and an absense of a script for the latter?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK Yes, yes, DUMB AND DUMBER TO angry, Jungian animus, post 9/11 blah blah WHERE'S MY INTERSTELLAR ESSAY DAMMIT??? -
@sethgs HULKS A GETTIN! HULKS A GETTIN!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@FilmCritHULK Could it also be that the first movie was just as guilty, but you were less aware of it then? -
@samwisel88 NOPE. WATCHED FAIRLY RECENTLY. JUST AS PUERILE, BUT ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION AND MOTIVATION IS DIFFERENT. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@FilmCritHULK I expected as much.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@filmcrithulk W/o those relatable humans to bounce off of they exist more as living gags and less as characters (no matter how silly).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK Farrelly bros. have grown more staid and regressive with the years; Lloyd and Harry are like their proxies, rebelling in fear.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.