@MuseZack @FilmCritHULK He didn't miss the mark. It's an amazing, gorgeous, stunning, brave film, in many respects better than the first.
-
-
Replying to @Haunt1013
@Haunt1013 AND HULK HAS AN ARGUMENT THAT IT'S NOT. AND THAT'S OKAY. (THIS IS ALSO WHY COLUMNS NEED TO BE PUT UP FIRST :/2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK@Haunt1013 Artistic differences of opinion aside, I don't think it's good-not-great box office is related to its quality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottMendelson
@ScottMendelson@Haunt1013 IN THIS CASE THERE'S AN ARGUMENT, AS "QUALITY" IS OFTEN RELATED TO RATE OF DECLINE. BUT IT'S COMPLICATED.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK@ScottMendelson@Haunt1013 who else is kinda more interested in this argument than why the dragon movie isn't good?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @poopittypoop
@FilmCritHULK@ScottMendelson@Haunt1013 "this" argument being how "quality" can correlate to box-office decline (sorry, idk how twit work)4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @poopittypoop
@poopittypoop@ScottMendelson@Haunt1013 WHICH IS A TESTAMENT TO THE "STICKINESS" OF A MOVIE, WHICH IS USUALLY BUILT ON MEANING.8 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK@poopittypoop@ScottMendelson + please cut me out of this thread. I don't care about money, and it meant the world to me.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Haunt1013
@Haunt1013 BUT HULK WILL JUST LEAVE IT THERE FOR NOW. CHEERS.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK yourself with a real voice in the chorus, so to speak, continue to talk about the film in terms of negatives.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Haunt1013 TO BE FEARFUL OF INTERNALIZING THEM. OR AT LEAST CONFLATING THE POWER OF THAT INTERNALIZATION AND THE PERSONAL MEANING TO YOU
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.