SO MUCH THAT IT CAUSED THE FILM TO HORRIBLY UNDER-PERFORM BECAUSE IT LACKED RESONANCE AND MEANING?
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK I haven't seen it but am a HUGE Dean DeBlois fan & loved the first. How did he miss the mark with this one?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MuseZack
@MuseZack@FilmCritHULK He didn't miss the mark. It's an amazing, gorgeous, stunning, brave film, in many respects better than the first.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Haunt1013
@Haunt1013 AND HULK HAS AN ARGUMENT THAT IT'S NOT. AND THAT'S OKAY. (THIS IS ALSO WHY COLUMNS NEED TO BE PUT UP FIRST :/2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK@Haunt1013 Artistic differences of opinion aside, I don't think it's good-not-great box office is related to its quality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ScottMendelson
@ScottMendelson@Haunt1013 IN THIS CASE THERE'S AN ARGUMENT, AS "QUALITY" IS OFTEN RELATED TO RATE OF DECLINE. BUT IT'S COMPLICATED.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK@Haunt1013 Short version, the popularity of franchise among kids was over inflated by adult critics/pundits who loved HTTYD.5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ScottMendelson
@ScottMendelson@FilmCritHULK#HTTYD2 didn't make as much as quickly as some wanted/expected, and yet it's still the best film of the year.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Haunt1013
@Haunt1013@ScottMendelson BACK. HULK WOULD NEVER "START FROM BOX OFFICE" IF THAT MAKES SENSE.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK Sorry. I'd be interested in reading your (very) long form thoughts on it. Though I'll probably throw things.@ScottMendelson2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Haunt1013 @ScottMendelson BUT UNDERSTAND THAT HULK WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IN YOUR COUNTER-ARGUMENT, TOO!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.