.@FilmCritHULK for a physicist/rage monster, you have a lot of conspiracy theories: first David O. Russell, now Michael Bay! Who’s next?
-
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK that they’re both deliberately pandering to the lowest common denominator but you have no way to prove it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mugwumpguts
@marriedtoafly WHICH IS MORE THAN UNKNOWABLE AND YET COMPLETELY FAIR TO DO UNDER THE PROPER GUIDELINES. ITS INTERPRETATION 101.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK I agree with your takes, I’d just be interested to see both of them engage in the discussion.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @mugwumpguts
@marriedtoafly ITS NOT A FILMMAKERS JOB TOO THO, ITS OURS. THEY SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM IT FOR THE MOST PART.
5:41 PM - 6 Jul 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.