Here's a vitriol-free review of Sony/MGM's ROBOCOP. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/66155
-
-
Replying to @ZuluTangoCharly
@ZuluTangoCharly It’s dropped. But you can still call me Beaks if you like.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ZuluTangoCharly
@ZuluTangoCharly Just got tired of writing under a pseudonym.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrbeaks
@mrbeaks Why are psuedonyms so common online (ie@FilmCritHULK and@hercAICN)? Easier to get scoops/test screenings if you're anonymous?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZuluTangoCharly
@ZuluTangoCharly@FilmCritHULK@hercAICN For me, it was cover for test screenings. My identity is well known now, so no need for it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mrbeaks
@mrbeaks@ZuluTangoCharly@hercAICN HULK'S IS A NECESSARY INDUSTRY PERCAUTION TURNED FUN EXERCISE IN GENERAL SILLINESS.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK Re: True Detective, some critics say Fukunaga et. al. are opting for style over substance (e.g. tracking shot). I disagree.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ebrown2112 THERE'S A NUANCED ARGUMENT FOR HOW THEY MISAPPLY STYLE SOMETIMES, BUT MOST OF IT IS SPOT ON. THAT KIND OF COMMENT TENDS TO BE
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.