-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK minor character arcs lead up to big ones our main character changes in a significant way at the end of each sectionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK they were. True phasesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK people think they can go the Lord of the Rings rout but LotR was one story divided in to chunks rather than a series -
@DavidPearson42
@FilmCritHULK and even those felt more self contained than most "we'll fix it in the next one" recent blockbusters.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@FilmCritHULK It felt like a genre TV series almost. Each episode self-contained, but building to a larger resolution.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@liberance@FilmCritHULK To be fair, the alternative can be just as bad. Retconning "done in one" films gets us Highlander II, III, etc.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@liberance@FilmCritHULK Completely agreed, but what's the studio formula? Seven figures and the lead's still alive = sequel?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK I wrote a piece that interprets the phenomenon of serial stories in blockbusters thru a Zizekian lens http://alayoftheland.blogspot.ca/2013/06/abandoned-hope-in-blockbuster-era.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@FilmCritHULK also why the british "mini-series" format works so well. Each episode has something to say and a reason for existing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.