A little disappointed that @FilmCritHULK wrote an explanation/apology for his MASS EFFECT 3 ending article. You can't please everyone.
-
-
Replying to @Benjamin_Nason
@Benjamin_Nason BUT SOMETIMES THE POINT IS TO LET PEOPLE KNOW YOU'RE TRYING.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK Why? Is that not counter-intuitive to giving an opinion to begin with?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Benjamin_Nason
@Benjamin_Nason BECAUSE HULK ORIGINALLY IMPLIED NOT AGREEING WITH THAT OPINION WAS AKIN TO BEING AN ENEMY OF ART.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK But I feel you had a valid point with that. Of course those who didn't like it are going to disagree with that statement.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Benjamin_Nason
@Benjamin_Nason HULK HAD A WHOLE PART ABOUT AGREEMENT.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
@FilmCritHULK I did read it. But I felt it was unnecessary as the point of writing an opinion is simply that, it's an opinion.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Benjamin_Nason BUT IN THE END HULK IS LESS IN THE OPINION BUSINESS IN MORE IN THE CONSTRUCTIVE DIALOG BUSINESS, YA KNOW?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.