But in a world where everything is turning to streaming and subscription models, the company cash flow now has nothing to do with your given success, so they paint you one way or the other to help their $$$ side.
-
Show this thread
-
I understand some of what I'm saying is generalization and there's a lot of little finicky points in this. There are people are genuine damn experts in all of it (and fighting accordingly). But this is absolutely the broad strokes of what is happening.
1 reply 2 retweets 121 likesShow this thread -
What's hilarious is the studios would have LOVED to have this years ago because it meant they wouldn't have to have shared backend, etc. But now we're undoing basically everything those artists and unions fought for.
4 replies 4 retweets 137 likesShow this thread -
"But but but please tell me it's good for consumers?" Sorry, it just means your favorite shows are going to get cancelled more and for less good reasons. Also movies don't make economic sense for streamers soooooooo not looking great on that front either.
3 replies 20 retweets 217 likesShow this thread -
Who is this ultimately good for? The answer, like most late stage capitalist developments, is always just the major streaming companies and that's it. So it may just seem like numbers reporting, but it's part of the ever-widening, horrifying jaw of the haves and have nots. END
6 replies 11 retweets 225 likesShow this thread -
Film Crit Hulk Retweeted Smēgols "Cameron" McGurkleburp
This is really important thing to add! The whole thing is it's not true. HBO will tell you that taking great shows past a couple seasons can ABSOLUTELY bring in new subs, in fact, it's the best way to do just that.https://twitter.com/SweetCammyMac/status/1354827525722140673 …
Film Crit Hulk added,
2 replies 21 retweets 163 likesShow this thread -
Look at the ratings below for Game of thrones. The ratings for breaking bad got bigger with every season. It is absolutely CRITICAL for your business. So why isn't NETFLIX realizing that?https://watchersonthewall.com/game-thrones-breaks-new-viewership-record-season-8s-winterfell/ …
3 replies 7 retweets 120 likesShow this thread -
The simple reason is because they haven't had a GREAT show yet that scaled up (outside of bojack, that went 6). It's mostly the mix of bad creative models and constantly misunderstanding their own data because they look at it from tech perspective over creative.
7 replies 8 retweets 157 likesShow this thread -
I swear every time I see Netflix talk about their data it's like the scene in THE JERK where the gunman is shooting at Steve Martin and hitting the cans and he's like "He hates these cans!" No, people don't "prefer" two seasons of slapdash TV that peters out quick.
5 replies 20 retweets 191 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
At an industry talk I was at, one showrunner said Netflix told them they had to have a really big moment halfway through episode 3 because people watch 2 and a half episodes on average. As far as I know, never considered most people were watching Two or three episodes.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
And to put in the obvious, putting someone big moment in the middle of ep 3 isn't going to save their disinterest in your show.
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
Totally! In fact it may increase disinterest if the rest of the episode doesn't live up to that.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.