No one is talking about how JAWS is still making money (and in the blu ray year, it was A LOT of money). Just as no one was realizing 4 JILLS IN A JEEP (1944) is still making money. And these libraries are HUGE.
-
Show this thread
-
There are thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of bits of media out there that are still being show and making money. And it's A LOT of money.
1 reply 3 retweets 123 likesShow this thread -
Good for studios, right? Of course. But the unions realized that a long time ago and fought so that movies / shows also has back-end points that go into the union. I cannot overstate how critical this money is to their function.
1 reply 12 retweets 182 likesShow this thread -
It goes right to health plans, protections, workman comp, general funds, and in short, it makes a film's success a success for everyone. But now here's where we get to the streaming of all of it.
1 reply 6 retweets 156 likesShow this thread -
In streaming, there is no back-end. Netflix is not selling your show a hundred times over. It's not putting the movie in theaters. It doesn't have to do ANY of those things. It's producing a work they solely own and exhibit forever. A closed loop.
1 reply 14 retweets 175 likesShow this thread -
Now, this is obviously a problem for hollywood's top talent, so what it means is that prospective back-end gets negotiated up front and put into their fee (hope you have a good agent!).
1 reply 3 retweets 139 likesShow this thread -
But the real ones suffering are the unions and smaller artists, especially ones who make sudden runaway "millions of people watching" shows. Without any backend, they're not seeing any financial part of the success they created.
2 replies 15 retweets 183 likesShow this thread -
Which brings us to the age old wisdom of "that's fine, you get to renegotiate your new higher salary next time when the contracts up!" Only the streamers, particularly netflix, aren't doing that.
1 reply 7 retweets 151 likesShow this thread -
They're cancelling hit and even modest hit shows the second new contract negotiations come up. Some of this has to do with their creative philosophy (or the lack), but they're moving onto other cheaper artists / whatever fresh new thing.
2 replies 16 retweets 215 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
They know that they won’t get new subscribers (people watching it already have the service) for a third or fourth season of a good tv show so instead they cancel and make something new, wash rinse repeat
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
What kills me is this is also WRONG. They have never produced a show that got better as it went. Look at the ratings for shows like BREAKING BAD. The ratings went up and up and up with every season. Same for lots of HBO.
-
-
Replying to @FilmCritHULK
I wasn’t aware of this, thank you for clarifying
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MetaReflexive
Netflix has so much data and they're always making the wrong conclusions. It's like the scene in the jerk where the gunman is shooting at him but hitting the cans and he's like "he hates these cans!"
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.