For the consumer? Absolutely. But the intent of these streaming services from Day 1 was not to save you money, it was to become the next cable. It's why Netflix aggressively expanded and spent sooooo much money. They wanted to take over the market, then raise $ with their controlhttps://twitter.com/kidyungn/status/1328461513632444416 …
-
-
It's about paying for content commercial free.
-
To be fair, it's about a lot of things.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Add that unrelated subscription services are often reduced to “Netflix, but for X”and you know the brand has truly achieved its goals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair to Netflix, the kinds of premium cable subscriptions you’d need to equal it end up costing hundreds a month for some people. You at least have the advantage of watching on demand without ads in the streaming age.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not when they're struggling to get positive free cash flow and will likely start increasing in churn rate once they slow down their content burn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're just running up against the same wall video games did a decade ago. Wages haven't gone up fast enough to keep up with the increases in price.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.