Re: the Cuphead discussion, it makes infinite more sense to link to a well-thought article then simply reference the lack. The ultimate point is that the creators' attitude of "It’s just visuals and that’s about it" can't be the way we engage arthttps://unwinnable.com/2017/11/10/cuphead-and-the-racist-spectre-of-fleischer-animation/ …
-
-
More over I did literally zero work to ensure their work was associated with racist history. They literally chose designs that are already associated with that history and we are pointing it out. That's the whole point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, you’re arguing that we should interpret art in the same way you do...that’s not how it works.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So by advocating that these artists are racist because they didn't create the way you wanted them to, you're bettering the medium? Have I got that correct?
-
I literally never say the "are racist." The article quite clearly makes the nuanced argument about the problems of using racist art and the lack of awareness. Your weird defensiveness is glaring, dude. My honest advice is to drop it here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You know full well that your first tweet dog-whistled "Cuphead =racist". Why not just elevate the conversation by truthfully exploring the complexity of this art style whilst taking into the account of intention of the artists.
-
Hahahahahahaha so we're using the term to "dog-whistle" for reverse racism now? Yeah that's a block. I get your game. Over. Done.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.