I’m not the one making judgements here. I am deliberately not being definitive, because I really don’t have all the facts or the full context to be comfortable doing that. Absolutism is not, in my experience, a good way of moving a debate forward.
-
-
Replying to @resourcefulco @JenAshleyWright
Question: Do you not make judgments about people who say it should okay not to serve black people?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @JenAshleyWright
Touché. Well, I rather like the approach that Sarah Silverman is using. Rather than condemn them as people for holding opinions that you find impossible to accept, try and engage them as fellow humans. Try and understand what their fears are and try and examine your own...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resourcefulco @JenAshleyWright
I get his fears. I know them. I write passionately about them all the time. But i am not going to "debate" someone who says women need to give malicious psychopaths sex to fix them. All that happens is they become the first victims. This is psychology 101. Hes dangerous.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @JenAshleyWright
Is that really what he says? Seems unlikely, but if so then doesn’t sound healthy. As a beta male, I don’t get the male dominance thing. But I know well enough that sex is damned complicated, and doesn’t always conform to social norms or direction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resourcefulco @JenAshleyWright
Thats literally what he said and is now risen to national promience. Stop giving "smart" monsters the benefit of the doubt. It horrendous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @JenAshleyWright
Citation needed, as google ain’t finding it. And I give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Labelling someone as a monster is part of the problem, imho. I get it - you find what he says scary. Doesn’t mean it can’t be debated and engaged with. And sorry - past midnight here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @resourcefulco
It's past debate though. How is this not clear? HOW ARE WE DEBATING "WOMEN ARE NOT SEX OBJECTS FOR PSYCHOPATHS. Here: "Peterson said that, "[Minassian] was angry at God because women were rejecting him." He added that "no one" cares about men like Minassian, which he claims is a
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @resourcefulco
problem for all of society. He concluded that, "The cure for that is enforced monogamy," implying the state should intervene in some manner to ensure men like Minassian are guaranteed to have a partner. " WHICH IS DISGUSTING HORROR.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @resourcefulco
Here's the article.https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/davide-mastracci/jordan-peterson-incel-nice-guys-enforced-monogamy_a_23447825/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And lastly, here's a tip: you do NOT give people the benefit of the doubt. If you did, you would be listening to me and the litany of women who said all this first. Instead, you listen to the monsters first. Give yourself a long look in the mirror and think about why that is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.