These aren't new fangled ideas. They are very old, damaging, ugly, possessive ones that speak to patriarchal ugliness. "He seems like a thoughtful person." That is the whole fucking danger right there. Because there's no actual thought or compassion behind them.
Thats literally what he said and is now risen to national promience. Stop giving "smart" monsters the benefit of the doubt. It horrendous.
-
-
Citation needed, as google ain’t finding it. And I give everyone the benefit of the doubt. Labelling someone as a monster is part of the problem, imho. I get it - you find what he says scary. Doesn’t mean it can’t be debated and engaged with. And sorry - past midnight here.
-
It's past debate though. How is this not clear? HOW ARE WE DEBATING "WOMEN ARE NOT SEX OBJECTS FOR PSYCHOPATHS. Here: "Peterson said that, "[Minassian] was angry at God because women were rejecting him." He added that "no one" cares about men like Minassian, which he claims is a
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.