Don’t know what “mole theory” means, and I would give more credit to the “objective” logic of the story, but I suppose that’s fair enough. I’m sure you’re aware that ESB has its own backlash, owed to the characters failures that seem completely avoidable to the viewers.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SrShravas @FilmCritHULK
I think we differ in that you think that things would have gone differently (or better) if Holdo has been forthcoming with the plan. I don’t really see it that way. Plus, Poe made his own disastrous secret plan out of spite, not knowing that one was in place.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @laruezzz @FilmCritHULK
Holdo isn’t flawless, but I don’t think she’s to blame. Regardless, I respect your interpretation and I enjoyed the discussion. Cheers.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SrShravas @laruezzz
Yeah, because god forbid a woman ever be morally superior to a man. This proves my whole goddam point and I'm sick of it. The stealth sexism everyone tells me is "objective" wrankles me so fucking hard.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @FilmCritHULK @laruezzz
There is literally nothing flawed with what she did. Nothing. You only think so because of a male-centric egoism that puts you into the lone desperado "i know what's best" mantra. When the entire point of his arc is undo the cowboy bullshit.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Continue thinking this is all about logic, but it betrays what really bothers you. We're done.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.