YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
-
-
Immunity to slander and libel
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If YouTube were to be categorized as a publisher (as it's currently acting) then Google would be responsible for curating all content on it, and it would die immediately. If YT wants to retain platform privileges, it cannot selectively curate content as they are.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.