YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
-
-
My understanding is that they shouldn’t enjoy the legal benefits of being a neutral platform while enjoying the freedom to be a publisher with editorial control. Pick one, operate as one.
-
What are those legal benefits?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There's also the issue that gov't action/inaction meddling has produced the environment - either purposefully or not - that has created a small, coordinated cabal of companies that control everything we can see. They're "private" but... are they in league with state actors.
-
No buts. They're private.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
WRONG. https://www.youtube.com/UKParliament The moment Governments start using the platform it really cannot follow a *political* ideological position.
-
Well, the government doesn't own the platform, just uses it as any user does.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 4 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.