I hear @patreon has instituted new rules banning illustrated incest, bestiality, and loli porn. Um... why? What does Patreon stand to gain by shunning artists based on the fetishes they draw? If they think this is a moral line in the sand, I've lost a ton of respect for them.
-
Show this thread
-
This is what I call a thought crime: If you even think about touching a kid or an underaged person, DRAWN or not, you are immediately condemned as if you actually had. A thought and porn of drawn characters are illegal in no way. It's too subjective to make a law of...
5 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
"if you even think about touching an underaged person... you are immediately condemned" as you should be
2 replies 0 retweets 48 likes -
If you go through with it, yes. Absolutely. But a thought is harmless without action. Restraint is key. It's what differs "normal people" and murderers, rapists, and pedophiles.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
intrusive thoughts are one thing but a genuine desire for sexual contact with children is dangerous and anyone that feels that way should get help and not exacerbate the problem with loli. it's not a "guilty pleasure" it's a substitute for harming real kids
1 reply 0 retweets 39 likes -
Would I blow your mind if I said that loli porn or drawn character porn would help alleviate the sexual desires because they allow you to deal with the sexual desires instead of bottling them up, which could lead to ACTUAL kid touching? No?
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
if being an incel will inevitably lead to touching even though you know it's wrong, you already show a basic lack of understanding of consent, which is another can of worms entirely. it doesnt matter how dry ur dms are u cannot touch someone who doesn't want u to, including kids.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.