YouTube banned a vegan dude who rescued pigeons and produced carefully worded content specifically designed not to violate their TOS. No reason given.
Ludicrous and proof of flagrant partisan censorship of conservatives.
RT if you think @TeamYouTube should restore his account.
I think youtube isn't private because it influences the lives of many people (a country for example). It can influence elections, people also require youtube to make research on independent media when an individual cannot trust a corporate media. YouTube deciding to ban whom...
-
-
They want is like youtube (a corporation) deciding what information to give you, deciding how you should think. They banned that pigeon guy, why? Can't someone else rebuke his points? He broke no rules, he didn't call for violence.
-
What annoys me a bit is that the same people who say "youtube is a private company they can do what they want", will actually disturb youtube when one of their own has been banned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.