"There is a moral obligation to redistribute sex and end incel suffering" Friendly neighborhood ethicist here, there really isn't. Not unless you want to craft an argument against a central pillar of bioethics, Auntonomy. A thread
-
Show this thread
-
One could argue a moral obligation to provide relief, but that's going to open up a lot of doors you don't want to open. Currently the idea of bodily autonomy is very strong, so strong in fact that we can't ethically use a dead body if the owner of said body didn't want that.
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likesShow this thread -
Currently, you're not obligated to provide a part of your body, no matter how insignificant, even if it will save a life. Blood donation, marrow donation, organs, all that would surely be obligatory. Hell, participation in human research would easily be argued as obligatory.
2 replies 1 retweet 21 likesShow this thread -
I don't want to go down the rabbit hole at the risk of being accused of slippery slope, but needless to say gross dudes being thirsty doesnt seem as important as needing a kidney, or bone marrow, and yet we've determined there's more harm than good in violating autonomy.
2 replies 1 retweet 25 likesShow this thread -
-
Replying to @fauxlacine
Reading those forum posts has killed me a little inside, but then someone argued for it in the paper and it just...how are we going backwards?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FayVFox
The discussions I have observed is that because the male to female population is usually around 50/50 there is no reason why everyone shouldn't get a mate, and to suggest otherwise is 'unfair'. To me that just denies peoples agency.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @fauxlacine @FayVFox
And honestly it really weirdly boils down human interpersonal relationships to numbers or objects rather than anything intimate or built through mutual experience. You exist therefore you are entitled to be assigned a mate.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fauxlacine
Yeah, it sounds like the extreme end of the 'nice guy' logic. Actually it sounds like the very extreme logic of very lonely people. You see similar sort of "missing the point" logic concerning people that aren't well socialized and friendship.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Just that "I talked to you on telegram we are friends." "why did my artist get mad I just wanted to be friends" Incel is the super extreme but this, not understanding relationships of any sort does seem to have a pattern
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.