I’m a liberal, dude. My causes 1) free speech and 2) don’t be a douche to others. I also only briefly looked up his name as I said, and did not judge the man at all. I, unlike those on the left, (like I thought I was until recently) don’t judge until I do my research. Smile, man.
-
-
Yet you saw enough to label him an anti-Semite lol
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I spent two minutes on Wikipedia and reported back saying I would have to look into it. Studying a “Large body of work” takes time if you’re actually looking for information. If you just want to silence people, well that’s the easy way out, and doesn’t have a great future.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Calling people "anti-Semitic" with no evidence of it has a chilling effect on speech, maybe don't do that next time if you care about that sort of thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What part of ‘two minute search on Wikipedia’ do you not understand? I did not call him anti-Semitic, Wikipedia did. It takes time to look into complex matters, or maybe that’s just my science background privilege talking.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ViWieVendetta @NeoconWatson and
That’s not a hypothesis. Having a bad day?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ViWieVendetta @NeoconWatson and
It’s verified, accepted and proved that you’re having a bad day? If that’s the case, I feel for you. I don’t wish bad days on anyone, even strangers behaving emotionally online. I’ve been there.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Sorry you’re so angry, whoever you are.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.