The general way to chase down that instability is: 1. See what comes to mind when you think of it or its features, or of how you know of it, or of how you approximate it, or of how you originally came to understand things being organized so that the idea was necessary
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
2. For all of that, because of the inaccessible nature of it, any time where you think of this absolute world, you are not thinking if it, but if your best approximation of it, a model of it. It's just a model. 3. Do the appropriate substitution 4. Repeat til destruction
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I kinda don't like contradictions like this. A lot of people, including myself a few years ago, thought of objectivity, reality, appearance, doubt and certainty in terms of this idea, and removing it leaves us also with no reflective understanding of these concepts
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Negative destructive views are easy, positive views are much more difficult. I don't have complete positive views for all of this, and the ones I do need lots of words. I can talk about it if you ask. This view is common and I think it's somewhat harmful/blocking
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
I want this contradiction out there and I want discussion about it to help build the positive views and argue and articulate myself. This is I think an important starting point. So, sorry for the contradiction and semantic emptying. But A few directions to start:
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
When a concept has lost its reflective sense, it can be tempting to throw it away, say it is illusory, incoherent, etc. We've done this with "absolute reality" in a complete and methodological way
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
But we did not do such a complete and methodological emptying of "real" and "objective" and "appearance". These are not philosophical terms of art like absolute reality.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Despite nonsystematic reflective emptying via emptying philosophical concepts our reflective understanding is dependent on, we still use them in the practical ordinary everyday, and it is there where they still have sense, and it is from there that a postivie view can be rebuilt
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
There is still an objective real world, it's just not what you thought it was. Things can be illusory or just appearance, but how that works is maybe not how you thought it did. You can be certain, and you can doubt, but these might not work how you thought they did
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit -
Fate Of Twist je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceFate Of Twist
If your conception of an absolute world was based on scientific theory in some sense, then I would recommend reading thishttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196902085058535424 …
Fate Of Twist je dodan/na,
Fate Of Twist @FateOfTwist_Science is not merely a bundle of theory. Science is a real world activity that human beings and human communities spend their time engaged in, making their livelihoods from, thinking, doing, training, practicing, mentoring, building, having fun with, arguing about, and so onPrikaži ovu nit1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđaPrikaži ovu nit
Fate Of Twist je proslijedio/a tweet korisnika/ceFate Of Twist
Here's a general positive take on ontologyhttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196908145022570496 …
Fate Of Twist je dodan/na,
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.