By different ways things are I don't mean a list of propositions that are true or false, and some are true in one activity and some are not in others.
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Consider a botanist and a chef, engaging in the activities of their profession handling an apple. The botanist might evaluate the health of the tree it came from, the process(es) by which it grew on the tree, its biochemical properties, etc.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The chef might think of what can be made from it, what pairs well with it. Beyond thinking, the chef will also have a practical physical affordance to do things like peel amd core the apple, or to macerate it. All of these are ways the apple is to each of these professionals
Prikaži ovu nit -
These are not all just factual but also practical. They are not contradictory but complementary, but also in a sense partially exclusive in that the apple can't be all of that at once simultaneously for you.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The sense of ontology which tries to be as broad and all encompassing as possible should seek to capture all of that, and more.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Science can easily block you from doing this, if your conception of ontology is purely scientific. > Science can talk about almost anything, but it can only talk about them in a very narrow set of wayshttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196902085058535424 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
The person to read for this is Heidegger, and that's where I got much of this from
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.