An absolute world which is fundamentally inaccessible, only approximated, is an incoherent concept (ie. It is semantically unstable, and the resolution of that instability ends with pure empty contradiction)
When a concept has lost its reflective sense, it can be tempting to throw it away, say it is illusory, incoherent, etc. We've done this with "absolute reality" in a complete and methodological way
-
-
But we did not do such a complete and methodological emptying of "real" and "objective" and "appearance". These are not philosophical terms of art like absolute reality.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Despite nonsystematic reflective emptying via emptying philosophical concepts our reflective understanding is dependent on, we still use them in the practical ordinary everyday, and it is there where they still have sense, and it is from there that a postivie view can be rebuilt
Prikaži ovu nit -
There is still an objective real world, it's just not what you thought it was. Things can be illusory or just appearance, but how that works is maybe not how you thought it did. You can be certain, and you can doubt, but these might not work how you thought they did
Prikaži ovu nit -
If your conception of an absolute world was based on scientific theory in some sense, then I would recommend reading thishttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196902085058535424 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Here's a general positive take on ontologyhttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196908145022570496 …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.