The general way to chase down that instability is: 1. See what comes to mind when you think of it or its features, or of how you know of it, or of how you approximate it, or of how you originally came to understand things being organized so that the idea was necessary
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
2. For all of that, because of the inaccessible nature of it, any time where you think of this absolute world, you are not thinking if it, but if your best approximation of it, a model of it. It's just a model. 3. Do the appropriate substitution 4. Repeat til destruction
Prikaži ovu nit -
I kinda don't like contradictions like this. A lot of people, including myself a few years ago, thought of objectivity, reality, appearance, doubt and certainty in terms of this idea, and removing it leaves us also with no reflective understanding of these concepts
Prikaži ovu nit -
Negative destructive views are easy, positive views are much more difficult. I don't have complete positive views for all of this, and the ones I do need lots of words. I can talk about it if you ask. This view is common and I think it's somewhat harmful/blocking
Prikaži ovu nit -
I want this contradiction out there and I want discussion about it to help build the positive views and argue and articulate myself. This is I think an important starting point. So, sorry for the contradiction and semantic emptying. But A few directions to start:
Prikaži ovu nit -
When a concept has lost its reflective sense, it can be tempting to throw it away, say it is illusory, incoherent, etc. We've done this with "absolute reality" in a complete and methodological way
Prikaži ovu nit -
But we did not do such a complete and methodological emptying of "real" and "objective" and "appearance". These are not philosophical terms of art like absolute reality.
Prikaži ovu nit -
Despite nonsystematic reflective emptying via emptying philosophical concepts our reflective understanding is dependent on, we still use them in the practical ordinary everyday, and it is there where they still have sense, and it is from there that a postivie view can be rebuilt
Prikaži ovu nit -
There is still an objective real world, it's just not what you thought it was. Things can be illusory or just appearance, but how that works is maybe not how you thought it did. You can be certain, and you can doubt, but these might not work how you thought they did
Prikaži ovu nit -
If your conception of an absolute world was based on scientific theory in some sense, then I would recommend reading thishttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196902085058535424 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
Here's a general positive take on ontologyhttps://mobile.twitter.com/FateOfTwist_/status/1196908145022570496 …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.