You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
What? What’s the problem with 1.2% ? That‘s better, I don‘t get it why they want 0.35%
There will probably be more sustainable activity on the chain if the transaction fee is burned rather than the transaction itself
Ah yes I get that. But the other proposal wanted to burn until 10 bil and then take that as the total supply. In this proposal they don‘t want that, right?
Just ignore this guy. It makes no sense to raise another proposal after the first one already passed.
I think you need clarity on this...
I strongly agree clarity is needed on this!
No it’s not. I don’t care about traders bc they don’t care about #LUNC. 1.2 % is better.
We want the version that burns units faster and in this case there is a legitimate proposal that received votes
By giving validators more rewards 
You understand well what's going on 
the only thing that proposal 4080 will do is create whales of developers, stop fucking, I already voted and it will not change every time. now they are interested in lunc because the community has not moved
the chain wont be used as much with 1.2 meaning the coin will be worth less , aka a bigger $hitcoin , we all want to get rich but tokenomics play a role
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
